Poster ID

Name Reviewer

Clarity/relevance of research question, Quality of background information, Appropriateness of methods, Significance of results and conclusions. 1=unacceptable, 2=weak, 3=moderate, 4=good; 5=very good Clarity/relevance of research question, Quality of background information, Appropriateness of methods, Significance of results and conclusions. 1=unacceptable, 2=weak, 3=moderate, 4=good; 5=very good 1 2 3 4 5

Overall layout/organization of the poster, Quality and clarity of visuals (graphs, figures, tables). 1=unacceptable, 2=weak, 3=moderate, 4=good; 5=very good Overall layout/organization of the poster, Quality and clarity of visuals (graphs, figures, tables). 1=unacceptable, 2=weak, 3=moderate, 4=good; 5=very good 1 2 3 4 5

Ability to explain the research clearly to viewers, Ability to answer questions. 1=unacceptable, 2=weak, 3=moderate, 4=good; 5=very good Ability to explain the research clearly to viewers, Ability to answer questions. 1=unacceptable, 2=weak, 3=moderate, 4=good; 5=very good 1 2 3 4 5

Originality of the research, Potential implications and significance of the findings. 1=unacceptable, 2=weak, 3=moderate, 4=good; 5=very good Originality of the research, Potential implications and significance of the findings. 1=unacceptable, 2=weak, 3=moderate, 4=good; 5=very good 1 2 3 4 5