Abstract ID

Name Reviewer

Score the overall quality of the abstract. 1=weak, 2=moderate, 3=good, 4= excellent Score the overall quality of the abstract. 1=weak, 2=moderate, 3=good, 4= excellent 1 2 3 4

Score the design and used methodology of the research. 1=weak, 2=moderate, 3=good, 4=excellent Score the design and used methodology of the research. 1=weak, 2=moderate, 3=good, 4=excellent 1 2 3 4

How innovative or original is the topic of the abstract? 1=not original, 2=slightly innovative, 3=quite original, 4=very innovative How innovative or original is the topic of the abstract? 1=not original, 2=slightly innovative, 3=quite original, 4=very innovative 1 2 3 4

How strong is the clinical applicability of the research? 1=weak, 2=moderate, 3=good, 4=excellent How strong is the clinical applicability of the research? 1=weak, 2=moderate, 3=good, 4=excellent 1 2 3 4

How well do the data support the conclusions? 1=weak, 2=moderate, 3=good, 4=excellent How well do the data support the conclusions? 1=weak, 2=moderate, 3=good, 4=excellent 1 2 3 4

Suggest acceptance or rejection Suggest acceptance or rejection Accepted Rejected

Suggest type of presentation Suggest type of presentation Oral Poster